|Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 3, Issue 1, Article 1(June, 2002)
Winnie Wing-Mui SO
Constructivist Teaching in Primary Science
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989), Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
Anderson, R. D., & Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. L. Gabel (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 3-44). New York: Macmillan.
Appleton, K., & Asoko, H. (1996). A case study of a teacher's progress towards using a constructivist view of learning to inform teaching in elementary science. Science Education, 80(2), 165-180.
Biggs, J. (1995). Teaching for better learning. In J. Biggs, & D. Watkins (Eds.), Classroom Learning: Educational Psychology for the Asian Teachers (pp. 261-279). Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Carin, A. A. (1993). Teaching modern science (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Cobb, P. (1996). Where is the mind? A coordination of sociocultural and cognitive constructivist perspectives. In C. T. Fosnot (eds.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 34-52). New York: Plenum.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
Education Commission (1994). Quality in school Education: Report of the working group on educational standards: Technical Annex 4F. Hong Kong: Education Commission.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
Fensham, P. (1992). Science and Technology. In Ph. W. Jackson (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum (pp. 789-829). New York: Macmillan.
Fischler, H. (1999). The impact of teaching experiences on student-teachers' and beginning teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning science. In L. John (Eds.), Researching Teaching: Methodologies and Practices for Understanding Pedagogy (pp. 172-197). U.K.: Falmer Press.
Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivist: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Eds.), Constructivisim: Theory, Perspective and Practice (pp. 8-13). New York: Teacher College Press.
Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how school should teach. New York: Basic Books.
Galton, M. (1995). Classroom observation. In L. W. Anderson (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education (2nd ed., pp. 501-506). U.K.: Pergamon.
Geelan, D. R. (1997). Epistemological anarchy and the many forms of constructivism. Science and Education, 6(1-2), 15-28.
Glynn, S. M., Yeany, R. H., & Britton, B. K. (1991). A constructive view of learning science. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning Science (pp. 3-19). Hilldale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hodson, D., & Hodson, J. (1998). From constructivism to social constructivism: a Vygotskian perspective on teaching and learning science. School Science Review, 79(2), 33-41.
Kober, N. (1993). What we know about science teaching and learning. Washington, DC: Council for Educational Development and Research.
Leinhardt, G. (1992). What research on learning tells us about teaching. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 20-25.
Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learners as information processors: Legacies and limitations of educational psychology's second metaphor. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 151-161.
Millar, R. (1989). Constructive criticisms. International Journal of Science Education, 11(Special Issue): 83-94.
Neale, D. C., & Smith D. (1990). Implementing conceptual change teaching in primary science. Elementary School Journal, 91(2), 109-32.
Novak J. D. (1998). Learning, creating and using knowledge: concepts maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. London: Nlawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Novodvorsky, I. (1997). Constructing a deeper understanding. The Physics Teacher, 35, 242-245.
Osborne, J. (1984). Workbooks that accompany basal reading program. In G. Duffy, L. Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension Instruction: Perspectives and Suggestions (pp. 163-186). New York: Longman.
Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1985). The generative learning model and its implications for science education. Studies in Science Education, 12, 59-87.
Perkins, D. (1999). The Many faces. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6-11.
Peterman, F. P. (1991). An experienced teacher's emerging constructivist beliefs about teaching and learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago IL, US.
Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Driver, R. (1992). Teaching for conceptual change: A review of strategies. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies (pp. 310-329). Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel.
Scott, P., Asoko, H., Driver, R., & Emberton, J. (1994). Working from children's idea: Planning and teaching a chemistry topic from a constructivist perspective. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone, & R. White (Eds.), The Content of Science: A Constructivist Approach To Its Teaching And Learning (pp. 201-220). London: Falmer Press.
Slavin, R. E. (1994). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (4th ed.). USA: Allyn and Bacon.
So, W. M. W.,Tang, K. Y., & Ng, P. H. (2000). Understanding science teaching and learning in primary classrooms. In Y.C. Cheug, K. W. Chow, & K. T. Tsui (eds.) School curriculum and development in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education.
Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupils' understanding of science, Studies in Science Education, 5(1), 49-59.
Solomon, J. (1997). Constructivism and primary science. Primary Science Review, 49, 2-5.
Spivey, N. N. (1997). The Constructivist Metaphor: Reading, Writing, and the Making of Meaning. San Diego: Academic Press.
Stoddart, T., Connell, M., Stofflett, R., & Peck, D. (1993). Reconstructing elementary teacher candidates' understanding of mathematics and science content. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(3), 229-241.
Stofflett, R. T., & Stoddart, T. (1994). The ability to understand and use conceptual change pedagogy as a function of prior content learning experience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 31-51.
Tobin, K. (1993). Referents for making sense of science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 15(3), 241-254.
Wilson, E. (2000). Learning concepts. In P. Warwick & R. S. Linfield (Eds.) Science 3-13: The past, the present and possible futures (pp.37-48). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching, Synthese, 80, 121-140.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1992). A constructivist's view of learning and teaching. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies (pp. 29-39). University of Kiel: Institute for Science Education.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.
Wildy, H., & Wallace, J. (1995). Understanding teaching or teaching for understanding: Alternative frameworks for science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 143-156.
Yager, R. E. (1991). The Constructivist Learning Model. Science Teacher, 58(6), 52-57.
Yeany, R. H. (1991). A unifying theme in science education? NARST News, 33, 1-3.
Copyright (C) 2002 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 3, Issue 1, Article 1(June, 2002). All Rights Reserved.