Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 11, Issue 1, Foreword (Jun., 2010)
John K. GILBERT

The role of visual representations in the learning and teaching of science: An introduction
Previous Contents

References

Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon,B., Silberstein,J. (1988). "Theories, principles and laws." Education in Chemistry: 89-92.

Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanism of analogical learning. Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 199-241.

Gilbert, J. K. (1993). Models and Modelling in Science Education. Hatfiield,Herts, Association for Science Education

Gilbert, J. K. (2005). Visualization: A metacognitive skill in science and science education. Visualization in Science Education. Dordrecht, Springer: 3-24.

Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Visualization:An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. Visualization: Theory and practice in science education. Dordrecht, Springer: 3-24.

Gilbert, J. K., C. J. Boulter, et al. (2000). Positioning models in science education & in design and technology education. Developing Models in Science Education. Dordrecht, Kluwer: 193-208.

Gilbert, J. K., C. J. Boulter, et al. (2000). Explanations with models in science education. Developing Models in Science Education. Dordrecht, Kluwer: 193-208.

Gilbert, J. K., Justi,R.J., Quieroz,A.S. (2010). The use of a model of modelling during the learning of ionic bonding. Contemporary Science Education Research: Volume 3 (International Perspectives), Istanbul, European Science Education Research Association.

Gilbert, J. K. and D. F. Treagust (2009). Macro, submicro and symolic representations and the relationships between them: Key models in chemical education. Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. Dordrecht, Springer: 1-8.

Gilbert, J. K. and D. M. Watts (1983). "Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education." Studies in Science Education: 61-98.

Golden-Meadow, S. (2006). Non-verbal communication:The hand's role in talking and thinking. Handbook of Child Psychology (Volume 2)(6th Ed.). London, John Wiley: 336-369.

Halpern, D. F., Collaer,M.L. (2005). Sex differences in visuospatial abilities: More then meets the eye. The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 170-212.

Harre, R. (1970). The Principles of Scientific Thinking. London, MacMillan.

Hesse, M. (1966). Models and Analogies in Science. London, Sheen & Ward.

Justi, R., Gilbert,J.K. (2002). "Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers." International Journal of Science Education: 369-387.

Keig, P. F., Rubba,P.A. (1993). "Translations of representations of the structure of matter and its relationship to reasoning, gender,spatial reasoning,and specific priuor knowledge." Journal of Research in Science Teaching: 883-903.

Kosma, R., Russell,J. (1997). "Multimedia and understanding: expert and novice responses to different reponses of chemical phenomena." Journal of Research in Science Teaching: 949-968.

Kosma, R., Russell,J. (2005). Modelling students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. Visualization in Science Education. Dordrecht, pringer: 121-146.

Krajcik, J. S. (1991). Developing students' understanding of chemical concepts. The Psychology of Learning Science:International perspectives on the psychological foundations of technology-related learning environments. Hillsdale,NJ, Erlbaum: 117-145.

Mayer, R. (2005). Multimedia learning: Guiding visuospatial thinking with instructional animation. The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial thinking. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 477-508.

Milheim, W. D. (1993). "How to use animation in computer assisted learning." British Journal of Educational Technology: 171-178.

N.Barnea (2000). Teaching and learning about chemistry and modelling with a computer-managed modelling system. Developing models in science education. J. K. Gilbert. Dordrecht, Kluwer: 307-324.

Newberry, M. (2010). The Thinking Frame. Cams Hill Science Consortium.

Newcombe, N. S., Learmonth,A.E. (2005). Development of spatial competence. The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 213-256.

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations:A dual coding approach. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Pope, M. and T. Keen (1981). Personal Construct Psychology in Education. London, Academic Press.

Pozzer, L. and M. Roth (2003). "Prevalence, function and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks." Journal of Research in Science Teaching: 1089-1114.

Roth, W.-M., G. Bowen, et al. (1999). "Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals." Journal of Research in Science Teaching: 977-1019.

Taber, K. (2009). Learning at the symbolic level. Multiple representations in chemical education. Dordrecht, Springer: 75-108.

Tuckey, H., Selvaratnam,A. (1993). "Studies involving three-dimensional visualization skills in chemistry." Studies in Science Education: 99-121.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society:The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge,MA, Harvard University Press.

Wu, H. K., Shah,P. (2004). "Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning." Science Education: 465-492.

 


Copyright (C) 2010 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 11, Issue 1, Foreword (Jun., 2010). All Rights Reserved.